Energy Market Volatility in August 2025

Navigating the Uncertainty:

Strategic Guidance Amid Oil Price Volatility and Geopolitical Risk

Published in Abu Dhabi - UAE, 25 July  2025 15:47am (GMT)


As we enter August 2025, energy markets remain highly volatile, shaped by a combination of geopolitical risks, supply shocks, and shifting investor sentiment.

Geopolitical Tensions Fuel Price Spikes

In June, Iran threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz—in response to Israeli strikes targeting its military and nuclear infrastructure—raising fears of acute supply disruption. Though the strait remains open, prices spiked 7–14%. Analysts warned that a prolonged closure could push Brent crude above $100–$150 per barrel.
Despite the surge, Goldman Sachs, Citi, and JP Morgan suggest the supply shock would require a sustained worst-case scenario before prices remained elevated.


OPEC+ Moves and Analyst Forecasts

OPEC+ announced an unexpected 548,000 bpd production increase starting August 2025—intended to regain market share amid stalling oil demand. Analysts warn this could exert downward pressure, with Brent prices potentially falling to $60/bbl by year-end.
Long-term outlooks suggest continued volatility: forecasts show WTI trading between $56–$74 depending on China's demand and policy signals.


Aucotra Trade Group Energy Market Turbulence

Volatility Impact on Energy Stocks and Equities

The Bloomberg Commodity Index volatility reached multi‑year highs (~16%) in Q2 2025—driven by Iran-Israel tensions, OPEC output changes, and demand uncertainty in China.
Energy sector stocks in the U.S. yielded a mixed performance: while early gains exceeded 10% YTD, by mid-June sector gains had narrowed to under 4%, lagging broader equity indices.
Morgan Stanley further cautioned that escalating Middle East conflict could elevate oil prices above $120/bbl, risking stagflation and equity downturns.


What Analysts Are Saying

  • JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs forecast a modest outlook for the second half of 2025, expecting oil prices to stabilize if no severe supply disruption materialises.
  • J.P. Morgan Research highlights persistent macroeconomic uncertainty as a driver of caution for global markets in 2H 2025.
  • BNP Paribas emphasises that continued volatility stems from shifting trade policies, political risk, and demand variability.



Advice for Auctora Clients: Navigating Volatility with Strategy

  1. Diversify Your Exposure
    Combine traditional fossil fuel volumes with alternative energy or commodity hedges to reduce reliance on any single market segment.
  2. Use Flexible Delivery Strategies
    Structure deals with staggered delivery and payment terms—shorter laycan windows, phased shipments, or spot-plus-trade contract structures to maintain optionality.
  3. Monitor Geopolitical & Trade Signals
    Keep a close eye on developments around the Strait of Hormuz, OPEC+ meetings, and U.S./EU tariff policies—they directly impact pricing, supply strategies, and risk profiles.
  4. Strengthen Relationships with Trusted Partners
    In volatile times, working with verified mandates, refiners, and logistics providers ensures credibility and smoother execution.
  5. Prepare Contingency Plans
    Maintain backup supplier routes, alternative vessels or ports, and adaptive documents to pivot quickly if situation changes—especially relevant in politically sensitive regions.


By staying agile, well-informed, and diversified, Auctora’s clients can boldly navigate the current volatility and capitalize on structural market shifts for sustained, strategic success.


February 2, 2026
Supply Chain Shifts, OPEC+ Moves, and the UAE’s Energy Strategy Published in Abu Dhabi, 02 Feb 2026 11:59 am (GST) At the start of February 2026, the global oil market stands at a crossroads. Crude prices are caught between two opposing forces. On one side, a growing supply surplus is exerting downward pressure. On the other, geopolitical tensions continue to inject volatility into pricing. Brent crude has recently approached the $70 per barrel level amid renewed U.S.–Iran friction, even as consensus forecasts point to average pricing in the low $60s for the year ahead. This complex environment is being shaped by three converging dynamics: structural shifts in global supply chains, recalibrated strategy within OPEC+, and long-term energy transition planning led by major producers such as the UAE. Global Oil Supply Chain Shifts T he global oil supply chain has been materially reshaped by geopolitics, sanctions, and changing demand centres. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, crude trade flows were rapidly reoriented. By 2024, approximately 81 percent of Russian crude exports were flowing into Asia, primarily China and India, compared with around 40 percent in 2021. Europe’s share fell to roughly 12 percent, down from nearly half prior to the conflict. European refiners responded by diversifying supply, increasing imports from the Middle East, Africa, and the Americas. This diversification improved resilience but raised transport costs and extended supply routes. Key global shifts include: China , now the world’s largest crude importer, imported approximately 11.1 million barrels per day in 2024. Russia has become its largest single supplier, supported by discounted pricing and long-term bilateral trade arrangements. India dramatically expanded imports of Russian crude, which now account for roughly one-third of its total oil intake. This shift strengthened India’s refining margins but triggered political pressure from Western governments throughout 2025. Europe , following its embargo on Russian oil, sources roughly one quarter of crude imports from Africa and over one fifth from the United States. Middle Eastern producers, including the UAE, have also increased volumes into European markets. The United States remains a substantial crude importer at approximately 6.6 million barrels per day, despite its position as a top global producer. The U.S. primarily imports heavy crude grades from Canada to meet refinery specifications, while exporting lighter grades and refined products. Beyond trade redirection, the supply landscape itself is expanding. New non-OPEC producers are gaining influence. Brazil, Guyana, and Canada are collectively expected to add around 2.4 million barrels per day of supply by 2026, intensifying competition and reinforcing a well-supplied global market. At the same time, oil demand growth continues to tilt eastward. Consumption in Europe and Japan remains subdued due to efficiency gains and slower growth, while China and India continue to drive incremental demand. This reinforces Asia’s central role in global oil flows and strategic planning.
January 7, 2026
A shift toward structured supply, disciplined capital allocation, and clearer pricing signals for producers and buyers alike. Published in Abu Dhabi, 07 January 2026 11:49 am (GST) As the global energy sector moves into 2026, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: oil markets are entering a more structured and disciplined phase. After several years marked by sharp volatility, geopolitical shocks, and shifting narratives around energy transition, the current environment is defined less by uncertainty and more by strategic positioning. Demand has proven resilient across key sectors including aviation, petrochemicals, power generation, and emerging markets. At the same time, supply growth has remained controlled, with producers prioritising capital discipline and long-term stability over volume expansion. This balance is setting a constructive foundation for the year ahead. In the Middle East, and particularly the UAE, energy markets are benefiting from clarity of direction. National oil companies continue to invest across upstream, downstream, and infrastructure projects while maintaining a pragmatic approach to energy transition. Rather than moving away from hydrocarbons, the focus is on optimisation, efficiency, and reliability. This approach is increasingly attractive to global buyers seeking secure, long-term supply in a fragmented world. Recent geopolitical events have reinforced the importance of jurisdictional stability rather than disrupting market fundamentals. While headlines can introduce short-term volatility, the oil market has shown an ability to absorb shocks without significant dislocation. This reflects both improved supply management and a deeper understanding among market participants of underlying demand dynamics.